ok, own up.

[emmelinemay]

which BASTARD was it that linked to the depressing garfield where he wakes up and every one is dead? and then made the suggestion that every garfield following that was garfield retreating into a fantasy world as he slowly starves to death in an empty house?

I can't read garfield anymore without that thought in the back of my mind.

Who ever you are, you are bad, and you get no biscuit.

Comments

[emmelinemay.livejournal.com]

[dangermonkey.livejournal.com]

sorry, text only browser, and you didn't specify an alt tag. So what are you n about? (:

[emmelinemay.livejournal.com]

you can't see jpg files?

And you claim macs are better?

tch.

[dangermonkey.livejournal.com]

but I'm not reading it on my mac. I'm reading it on a FreeBSD (http://freebsd.org) server in Brighton (http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?q=Devil%27s+Dyke+Road,+Brighton+and+Hove,+BN1&ie=UTF8&lr=lang_en&hl=en&z=14&om=1&iwloc=addr), which is running the web browser w3m (http://w3m.sourceforge.net/) which is a Virtual Terminal (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_console) which can't display inline images.

I connect to that terminal via OpenSSH (http://openssh.com/) which I run on my PowerBook (http://www.apple.com/)

I hope I got all that HTML right

[emmelinemay.livejournal.com]

and i don't know what an 'alt' tag is.

[hsb.livejournal.com]

When you post an image, HTML gives you the option to specify an alternative for text-only browsers (it's called an alt tag, like the bold tags and all that). So you could just have [alt: emmelinemay is confused] or whatever for each of these jpgs. Only, I've never used one, so don't think that is the appropriate way to lay out an alt tag.

H

[emmelinemay.livejournal.com]

and it also wouldn't be very funny in this case, seeing as the picture IS the joke, rather than the text ;)