Animals != humans
Apr. 8th, 2008 01:10 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Knut 'senselessly murdered the carp', fishing them out, playing with them and then leaving the remains.
Ok, seriously guys. It's a BEAR. Bears eat fish. If a lion kills an antelope, it's not murder, it's nature. Murder is a human concept, and not even a universal one at that. Go back into (even recent) history, or deep enough into the uncharted jungles you'll find tribes who won't understand the concept.
Does that mean anyone that eats meat is a murder? Or are you just an accessory to murder? Is it only murder if you kill someone for fun? If you eat a hamburger for fun, does that count?
This news popped up my my friends list at the same moment that my colleagues and I were discussing Louis Theroux's 'African Hunting Holiday' documentary (avialable on IPlayer for 5 days). I've mixed opinions about Theroux, I think he asks very leading questions and enters situations with a strong bias. I've found some of his shows really fascinating and a bit scary, but others I feel he tries to make an issue out of something that should be a non-issue. I felt a similar way about the game hunting episode - but then, it did resonate with my thoughts lately about my moral choices, my food choices, and how I see the world.
I've been to South Africa, and I admit, it did change me a little. It's hard to stand underneath that sky that goes on forever, and the landscape stretching around you, and everything being so open and different, without feeling yourself changing a little.
Mum has some rugs in her B&B, a zebra in the Zebra Room, a wildebeest in the cottage, and some form of bok (a blasebok perhaps?) in the leopard room (leopard skins are really expensive). At first, I was horrified by these rugs. Mum assured me she'd got them from licensed places, where the game is managed, in much the same way as those featured on Theroux's show.
I came to understand how things are in Africa, and understand why game hunting there is actually a really important industry. It is mentioned in the documentary, but I don't feel that it was truly a two sided argument you got.
Theroux has got emotion on his side - Lions are handsome, Impala are basically Bambi, and zebras are stripy horses. It is emotional watching people kill them for fun, when you love and respect animals, but if you can put that aside, you can understand that the industry is, perhaps paradoxically, vital to the survival of many species in Africa. It creates employment, provides industry in the meat and skins, and encourages tourism. All very important. It's important to realise that Africa != the UK. Things are very, VERY different there. One guy does point this out to Loius, that he was raised in a different culture, that to understand hunting you need to understand Africa.
An interesting point is made in the programme drawing a contrast between the game reserves and traditional farming, asking why is game hunting any more cruel than intensive farming? It's a good point. In many farms, the animals have little space to roam as they would in the wild, they're transported alive in cramped lorries to slaughterhouses where they are lined up and killed, sometimes (as in the case of Halal meat) pretty damn cruelly.
On a game reserve, the animals live out a free life in huge amounts of space, with little to fear from even lions as they're often kept separately, they're killed (on the one shown at least) with bolt guns which are quieter than shotguns to avoid stress to the other animals, they're killed as quickly as possible without any stressful buildup.
I, personally, cannot understand why anyone would find it fun to kill an animal for sport. But that is just me, and I am not going to say that it's wrong, just because I can't understand it.
I think the only person that really irritated me in the whole thing was Louis Theroux himself, when he said that he would eat the animal, but couldn't kill it.
I've always rather felt that if you aren't prepared to kill an animal, you shouldn't eat it. You should know where it came from, know what die for your chicken korma, or your kangeroo burger, or your crocodile steak.
I know that if I was stuck on an island, and had a choice between starving to death and killing a bunny rabbit, it's me all the way, sorry Bugs.
The reason I stopped eating meat, waaaay back before I was a teenager, was that I found the whole thing rather grim, to be honest. I remember becoming aware when I was very little that baa-lambs = lamb chops and thinking not 'awww, I can't eat the baby lamb' so much as 'euw, that's DISGUSTING I don't want to eat a dead thing'. My parents would get me to eat meat by making sure it looked nothing like meat.
Once I was old enough, I badgered my Mum to let me go veggie, and she relented. I've never looked back. Occasionally I'll think about a burger, but that's about it. Never been tempted, probably won't ever be, unless it's me or the rabbit on that island.
It was never a moral decision then. In time, as I learned more about the farming industry, it became a moral decision. I still see nothing wrong, however, with eating free range meat, 'happy' animals if you like. Animals that have a good, free, normal life up until the point they're used for food. I also see nothing wrong, if you're going to kill that animal for food, to use the rest of it as a by product.
It becomes sticky ground for me when you are killing it solely for the fur or skin, and the rest is a by product. It becomes even stickier when the animals are mis-treated in life.
I realised I had a dairy 'issue' relatively recently, maybe about 5 or 6 years ago. At first I used pills from America, but as I learnt more about the dairy industry, I was put off.
I was put off, and this is important, NOT because I think it's wrong to use animal products. I was put off because of the treatment of the animals in that industry. That's why I decided to avoid dairy.
Eggs do funny things to me, so I avoid them anyway. I hate the idea of animals being used for cosmetic testing, so I avoid those products where I can.
But I've never managed to be totally vegan, and to be honest, I'm no longer sure I want to. I've realised that for many vegans, it's all about seeing our use of animal products as inherently wrong, seeing the act of eating meat as an act of murder, seeing the act of wearing leather shoes as an unnecessary vanity.
I don't agree. All animals use all other animals, for food, protection, even for things like lice removal. Humans are naturally omnivorous, we have the teeth for it, and we can't get all of our nutrients from vegetables alone, that's why veggies/vegans need to take supplements to stay healthy.
I also think that many of the products used by vegans are possibly worse for the environment than the 'real thing'. Fibres and even food are so full of horrendous things (read the ingredients on some vegan cheese sometime) that can't be good for the environment, including petrochemicals. I've met a number of vegans who happily wear PVC, blissfully unaware of how damaging the production of it can be to the environment and animals.
So, because I disagree with, well, pretty much every vegan I've ever met, I can only conclude that I'm not, actually, a vegan.
I am a lactose and egg intolerant vegetarian. I might occasionally say in a restaurant that I eat a vegan diet, simply because that's easier. But I don't consider myself a vegan any more. It doesn't change anything about the way I eat, I still can't have pizza, or a fry up, but it does change the way I see myself I guess.
I stand by my opinion though, that if you are going to eat meat, you should eat any meat, not pick and choose which you will eat because some are 'cute'. I also think that if you are going to eat meat, you should be able to kill an animal with the knowledge that it will be eaten.
What do you think?
[Poll #1167728]
You can read a related rant, including what I think about PETA, here
Ok, seriously guys. It's a BEAR. Bears eat fish. If a lion kills an antelope, it's not murder, it's nature. Murder is a human concept, and not even a universal one at that. Go back into (even recent) history, or deep enough into the uncharted jungles you'll find tribes who won't understand the concept.
Does that mean anyone that eats meat is a murder? Or are you just an accessory to murder? Is it only murder if you kill someone for fun? If you eat a hamburger for fun, does that count?
This news popped up my my friends list at the same moment that my colleagues and I were discussing Louis Theroux's 'African Hunting Holiday' documentary (avialable on IPlayer for 5 days). I've mixed opinions about Theroux, I think he asks very leading questions and enters situations with a strong bias. I've found some of his shows really fascinating and a bit scary, but others I feel he tries to make an issue out of something that should be a non-issue. I felt a similar way about the game hunting episode - but then, it did resonate with my thoughts lately about my moral choices, my food choices, and how I see the world.
I've been to South Africa, and I admit, it did change me a little. It's hard to stand underneath that sky that goes on forever, and the landscape stretching around you, and everything being so open and different, without feeling yourself changing a little.
Mum has some rugs in her B&B, a zebra in the Zebra Room, a wildebeest in the cottage, and some form of bok (a blasebok perhaps?) in the leopard room (leopard skins are really expensive). At first, I was horrified by these rugs. Mum assured me she'd got them from licensed places, where the game is managed, in much the same way as those featured on Theroux's show.
I came to understand how things are in Africa, and understand why game hunting there is actually a really important industry. It is mentioned in the documentary, but I don't feel that it was truly a two sided argument you got.
Theroux has got emotion on his side - Lions are handsome, Impala are basically Bambi, and zebras are stripy horses. It is emotional watching people kill them for fun, when you love and respect animals, but if you can put that aside, you can understand that the industry is, perhaps paradoxically, vital to the survival of many species in Africa. It creates employment, provides industry in the meat and skins, and encourages tourism. All very important. It's important to realise that Africa != the UK. Things are very, VERY different there. One guy does point this out to Loius, that he was raised in a different culture, that to understand hunting you need to understand Africa.
An interesting point is made in the programme drawing a contrast between the game reserves and traditional farming, asking why is game hunting any more cruel than intensive farming? It's a good point. In many farms, the animals have little space to roam as they would in the wild, they're transported alive in cramped lorries to slaughterhouses where they are lined up and killed, sometimes (as in the case of Halal meat) pretty damn cruelly.
On a game reserve, the animals live out a free life in huge amounts of space, with little to fear from even lions as they're often kept separately, they're killed (on the one shown at least) with bolt guns which are quieter than shotguns to avoid stress to the other animals, they're killed as quickly as possible without any stressful buildup.
I, personally, cannot understand why anyone would find it fun to kill an animal for sport. But that is just me, and I am not going to say that it's wrong, just because I can't understand it.
I think the only person that really irritated me in the whole thing was Louis Theroux himself, when he said that he would eat the animal, but couldn't kill it.
I've always rather felt that if you aren't prepared to kill an animal, you shouldn't eat it. You should know where it came from, know what die for your chicken korma, or your kangeroo burger, or your crocodile steak.
I know that if I was stuck on an island, and had a choice between starving to death and killing a bunny rabbit, it's me all the way, sorry Bugs.
The reason I stopped eating meat, waaaay back before I was a teenager, was that I found the whole thing rather grim, to be honest. I remember becoming aware when I was very little that baa-lambs = lamb chops and thinking not 'awww, I can't eat the baby lamb' so much as 'euw, that's DISGUSTING I don't want to eat a dead thing'. My parents would get me to eat meat by making sure it looked nothing like meat.
Once I was old enough, I badgered my Mum to let me go veggie, and she relented. I've never looked back. Occasionally I'll think about a burger, but that's about it. Never been tempted, probably won't ever be, unless it's me or the rabbit on that island.
It was never a moral decision then. In time, as I learned more about the farming industry, it became a moral decision. I still see nothing wrong, however, with eating free range meat, 'happy' animals if you like. Animals that have a good, free, normal life up until the point they're used for food. I also see nothing wrong, if you're going to kill that animal for food, to use the rest of it as a by product.
It becomes sticky ground for me when you are killing it solely for the fur or skin, and the rest is a by product. It becomes even stickier when the animals are mis-treated in life.
I realised I had a dairy 'issue' relatively recently, maybe about 5 or 6 years ago. At first I used pills from America, but as I learnt more about the dairy industry, I was put off.
I was put off, and this is important, NOT because I think it's wrong to use animal products. I was put off because of the treatment of the animals in that industry. That's why I decided to avoid dairy.
Eggs do funny things to me, so I avoid them anyway. I hate the idea of animals being used for cosmetic testing, so I avoid those products where I can.
But I've never managed to be totally vegan, and to be honest, I'm no longer sure I want to. I've realised that for many vegans, it's all about seeing our use of animal products as inherently wrong, seeing the act of eating meat as an act of murder, seeing the act of wearing leather shoes as an unnecessary vanity.
I don't agree. All animals use all other animals, for food, protection, even for things like lice removal. Humans are naturally omnivorous, we have the teeth for it, and we can't get all of our nutrients from vegetables alone, that's why veggies/vegans need to take supplements to stay healthy.
I also think that many of the products used by vegans are possibly worse for the environment than the 'real thing'. Fibres and even food are so full of horrendous things (read the ingredients on some vegan cheese sometime) that can't be good for the environment, including petrochemicals. I've met a number of vegans who happily wear PVC, blissfully unaware of how damaging the production of it can be to the environment and animals.
So, because I disagree with, well, pretty much every vegan I've ever met, I can only conclude that I'm not, actually, a vegan.
I am a lactose and egg intolerant vegetarian. I might occasionally say in a restaurant that I eat a vegan diet, simply because that's easier. But I don't consider myself a vegan any more. It doesn't change anything about the way I eat, I still can't have pizza, or a fry up, but it does change the way I see myself I guess.
I stand by my opinion though, that if you are going to eat meat, you should eat any meat, not pick and choose which you will eat because some are 'cute'. I also think that if you are going to eat meat, you should be able to kill an animal with the knowledge that it will be eaten.
What do you think?
[Poll #1167728]
You can read a related rant, including what I think about PETA, here
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 01:08 pm (UTC)What animal was it?
I am far more respectful of meat eaters that can do that than I am of people that will eat a burger but turn away when an animal is killed on TV. If you're going to eat meat, you should damn well be aware of what it is you're eating.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 01:09 pm (UTC)If I was dull enough to go fishing though, then I could, but I think that's because I'm used to seeing whole dead fish in shops, whereas you almost never see, say, an entire dead pig at the butcher. Even if it looks whole, then it's been skinned by that point, and so looks more like meat than an actual dead animal, and dead animals freak me out in a way that meat never does.
Mmm, meat.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 01:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 01:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 01:12 pm (UTC)And thanks :)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 01:13 pm (UTC)I can't get over that people are shocked that a bear is being a bear. Hand reared or not, it's a fucking BEAR. Hand rearing a bear is not going to make it human.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 01:18 pm (UTC)I think I've got very similar atttiudes to you. If one is talking about the ethics of the food industry, then local farmhouse-produced meat is going to be more 'ethical' than a packet of mass-produced, artificial Quorn sausages. My problem, though, is that I JUST DON'T LIKE MEAT. I have tried eating it a few times since I've grown out of the whole 'meat is murder' thing, and even the most exquisitely-cooked, free range, top quality meat just tastes like YUK to me. It's a dead thing! I can't eat that!
So I eat the Quorn sausages instead because, well, I just prefer them. If I had to kill and eat meat to survive, though, I suspect I'd have to learn to like it.
Also ... most vegans are mental! We had three walk out of our pub the other week because THERE WAS HONEY ON THE PARSNIPS on the Sunday roast! Mental I tell ya!
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 01:25 pm (UTC)I think if I wasn't so repelled by the idea of eating meat, I'd switch back and go organic only - I really think that's more sensible and viable than vegetarianism. I really don't think I could eat meat again though.
I can't eat quorn, it's got eggs in, and eggs do not make my stomach happy at all.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 01:20 pm (UTC)I eat meat. I'm not a 'carnivore' but I do enjoy it. However I'll only buy organic, free range meat and I prefer to get it from butchers who can guarantee certain ethical standards.
The African example I have is an odd one. The Masai warriors are expected to run down and kill a lion; it is a coming of age rite. they do not eat the lion but they do use the skin and parts of the body for rituals and as adornment. When I spent some time with them I found this difficult. You are given a 'welcome hat' made from lion skin to wear. I'm still of the opinion that it is the Masai equivalent of a clown hat and they give it to people so they can laugh at them, but if that is the case then the Masai are bloody good at playing it deadpan. It did, however, make me feel uncomfortable. It is the same as wearing fur ... I can't bring myself to do it; even rabbit fur (and remember I eat rabbit meat) seems wrong to me.
Leather, on the other hand, seems fine to me whereas there is no way I would eat horse meat again, nor zebra, nor camel (out of respect for the feelings of a friend of mine who thinks they are beautiful and would be upset by it)
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 01:21 pm (UTC)As to your last para, I would just say that I don;t think meat eaters shoudl be expected to eat any meat. Why shouldn't they be allowed to discriminate amongst certain meats? I mean, I eat some veggies but not others, because I find the others (sprouts, particularly) disgusting. Similarly, I eat some animals but not others (insects for example) that I find disgusting.
-x-
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 01:28 pm (UTC)For example, many people won't eat animals that are carnivores or omnivores, for health risk reasons, or taste reasons.
My issue is when someone will eat a cow, but not a rabbit, because a rabbit is 'cute'; or a deer because 'it's bambi' or will point at a culture that eats cats or zebra, and goes 'that's horrible' because we see cats as pets or zebra as horses, without being aware that distinctions like that are entirely cultural.
I think caymans are cute, but if I was a meat eater and was offered a cayman burger I'd probably try it.
Sorry for not making that more clear!
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 01:33 pm (UTC)Maybe there would be berries on the desert island. I could eat them. :-)
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 01:35 pm (UTC)We'll just have to hope you're never trapped on the Island Of The Rabbits.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 01:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 01:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 01:57 pm (UTC)It's a good point, it's another factor in my decision, along with my distinctly un-vegan attitude to wool - I don't see a problem with wool at all. I gre up in he middle of sheep farming country, those sheep are bread to produce so much bloody wool they can't moult it all off. We bred them that way, we've a duty of care to look after them.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 02:00 pm (UTC)Also : IT'S A FUCKING BEAR!
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 02:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 02:01 pm (UTC)If I had been brought up in a culture where people are self-sufficient, I don't doubt that I would be quite comfortable killing animals. I wasn't raised in that kind of culture; I was raised, instead, in a culture where people do specialised jobs. I don't think that makes it hypocritical to benefit from that specialisation, and I've never really understood the argument that one shouldn't eat meat unless one could butcher it oneself. Why?
I agree that we should try to know a bit about where our food comes from, partly for our own health, and partly to ensure, as far as possible, that we're using good farming practice. BHut I really don't think we all need a stint in the slaughterhouse just to prove our meat-eating credentials, any more than vegans should all be forced to make their own tofu.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 02:07 pm (UTC)There are many people that eat meat and yet can't stand the thought that it's a dead animal - I personally think that's a bit weird. I've chosen not to eat meat because I don't like the idea that meat = dead animal.
I agree that people should be more aware of what they eat, absolutely, but I still find it weird that people, like Louis Theroux in that show, could eat an animal they couldn't kill.
I guess I'm saying I respect a meat eater who feels they could actually kill what they eat, and would question one that couldn't, why not? You give a very convincing argument for that though, so well done! (what more would I expect from you, though, really?!)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 02:11 pm (UTC)I haven't killed an animal to eat, I wouldn't want to personally kill an animal to eat (and most definitely not for sport), but I'm pretty sure I could do it if I had to.
As for hunting, I don't necessarily agree with it, but realise in some cases it has to be done to keep the balance right (although usually the balance being wrong is our fault in the first place...). But I would never wear fur or leather that was made from skins taken off animals bred solely for their hide. Although again, I don't really have a problem with vintage fur, I see that as making the most of a bad thing, making sure that at least if it was killed for that reason and someone else bought it, it gets used for as long as is possible.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 02:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 02:20 pm (UTC)But what if you don't like all meat!? Different animals taste very different. There is a world of difference between a salmon fillet and a topside of beef!
I agree that if you are going to eat meat, you should be able to hunt and kill for yourself. which is why I have no problem eating fish because I have regularly gone mackerel fishing, killed, gutted and barbequed it straight after.
However, I could not kill a cow (as much as I would love to as cows are evil) and therefore, I will not eat it.
There is a big difference between a humble mackerel and an intelligent mammal.
I once ate a chicken (my aunt owned a poultry farm) that I had killed and de-feathered myself. It had enjoyed a wonderful free range and long life and it had a name. I felt that I needed to know if I could actually do such a thing and therefore not lead a hypocrypital life.
Back to the fish thing...I am happy to eat fish if it has been ethically caught and is organic and natural. Otherwise I won't touch it.
It's the same for even milk and cheese. It has to be organic and ethically farmed with no antibiotics and hormones being pumped into the cows!
So I guess I am unsure as to what that makes me.
I'm hardly a vegetarian, clearly! But I do feel very strongly about the way animal husbandry is carried out in the majority of farms.
And if I was hungry, I would catch, skin and devour a cute ickle bunny wunny with nary a second thought.
I eat what I know I could handle killing if I had to...but nothing more than that.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 02:27 pm (UTC)Taste is a sensible reason not to eat something. I'm a vegetarian, but don't eat all vegetables because they don't all taste good to me. Sprouts? EUW. But I'm not going to refuse to eat a fractal cabbage because it's pretty.
I felt that I needed to know if I could actually do such a thing and therefore not lead a hypocrypital life.
Good for you! I really respect that - it must be even harder when it's got a name!
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 03:13 pm (UTC)Faintly related anecdotes: My ex worked with a guy who lived on a farm and occasionally turned up with very fresh meat for one reason or another. So I have had a brace of pheasant hanging in my kitchen until they were ready to eat, because he shot them on the way to work (not clear why), but didn't want the hassle of cleaning them to eat.
Warning: do not read this one if squeamish.
Same guy also provided housemate-that-liked-to-cook-serious-food with a lamb. The deal was that Sean would bring in two lambs, Bal's dad the butcher would do the honours and get one for his efforts, while housemate Dan would get the other. Bal made the mistake of saying he wanted the meat to be very fresh. So Sean turns up one afternoon with two lambs and dumps them on the table, saying breezily, these were alive 4 hours ago, is that fresh enough for you?
To add to Bal's horror, it turned out that despite his father's profession, Bal had not really thought about the fact that a lamb ready for eating is fully grown, it just hasn't gone through a winter. So it was 6 foot of meat, sitting on a table in black bin bags. His face was a picture.
Dan knew, fortunately, and Bal's dad thought he was hilarious. I missed the 6 hour slow cooked dish that Dan did with the bulk of it for a bunch of the lads, but apparently it was delicious.
H
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 03:25 pm (UTC)'Foodism' is becoming much aking to religon or the like atm - and just like anything - i so very much dislike being told what to do or justify my choices. I think its everyones duty to not be ignorant about food - but if you still want a dirty chicken burger at 3am - that is anyones choice - as the choice will always be availbale...
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 03:28 pm (UTC)It's not evolution, it's cultural. There are many places in the world were people still do kill to eat. The rise of convenience foods isn't evolution.
While people still buy those awful chicken burgers, there will be a mass market, and chicken will suffer. This makes me a sad panda.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 03:39 pm (UTC)Lots of other cultures do very nasty things to animals indeed - just as we do. Humans though have always been the top of the food chain, even since we stood up on 2 legs. i just hope that an animal lives a good life and a quick death.
I like animals alot - its funny though - i just rarely equate it to the lumps in a polysyrene tray or what i get given in a resturant.I think alot of people think like this - i do not nessicarily think this makes bad or stupid people.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 03:41 pm (UTC)I believe we hae a duty of care to animals that we are not fulfilling, and strongly disagree with intensive farming.
I think people should think about where their food comes from.
I do *not* think that meat is murder.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-04-08 04:29 pm (UTC)I have to admit that if I shot an animal, I would probably cry whilst skinning and cleaning it, but that's just me.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-09 10:22 am (UTC)"Ok, seriously guys. It's a BEAR. Bears eat fish."
Yes.
They EAT fish.
They are not known for merely killing them and ignoring them. That would be unusual behaviour for a polar bear.
Unlike say.... a cat doing so.
Hence the concern I imagine.... still you lock a polar bear up in a cage all day and I suppose they go mad.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-09 01:46 pm (UTC)There's far more cruelty in Sainsbury's meat aisle that ever you'd find on a big game hunt.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-09 02:01 pm (UTC)Did you see the programme?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-04-10 01:06 pm (UTC)I've seen pictures of my pig before it went to the butcher. I at least try to make sure I get animals that lead a good life.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-10 01:09 pm (UTC)I wish everyone felt like this. I've never been a meat is murder person, but I do feel that industrial/batter farming is torture. I think it's a shame that veggies like me end up with the MEAT IS MURDER tag, as that's such an extreme view, it's not going to help change anything.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-04-10 01:08 pm (UTC)I'm a meat eater, and I wouldn't have a problem with killing an animal to feed myself, but I don't know thing one about properly skinning and gutting an animal so I would probably die of some horrible parasite. But I would try, damnit!
no subject
Date: 2008-04-10 01:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-04-10 04:18 pm (UTC)i don't pick and choose which animals to eat based on cuteness- i do it based on level of intelligence. i don't feel comfortable eating smart animals- cows & pigs are smarter than chickens, turkeys, and most [if not all] fish.
i'm not sure if that's as bad, though...and i still wear leather shoes.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-10 05:53 pm (UTC)I want to try everything at least once, and try not to discriminate when it comes to what I eat; I've eaten the standard meats -- beef, pork, chicken, turkey, venison, boar etc. as well as insects, whale, horse, and snail. When I took a trip to Viet Nam I was going to try some dog too, but the season unfortunately wasn't right for it :(
I think it's hypocritical for people to turn their noses up at dog or horse meat but not pork or beef.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-10 08:38 pm (UTC)