definite faith
Feb. 5th, 2009 01:27 pmThanks to bluekeiran, I just made my first complaint about an advert ever.
Following the (awesome) Athiest Bus campaign, where there was 'probably' no god, there are reports that the Christian party plan to run adverts that state 'there definitely is a god'.
I very much enjoyed the Atheist Bus campaign, which stated 'There's probably no god, now stop worrying and enjoy your life' and was pleased that the ASA ruled there was no breach of advertising codes, and allowed the campaign to go ahead. However, I read today (article linked above) that The Christian Party plan to run adverts which state 'There definitely is a God.'
As the existence of God is a matter of faith, not fact, I find it offensive as well as misleading that the Christian Party are apparently allowed to use the definitive, where as the Atheist bus campaign had to make do with 'probably'. Where opinion/faith is concerned, I think is inappropriate to allow any advertiser to explicitly state that there is or is not a God, when there is no proof either way, and so the statement is unverifiable.
I would appreciate it if this matter could be looked into, and whether The Christian Party's adverts should be, if not withdrawn, re-worded in the name of accuracy and fairness.
It may go no further, but if enough people complain, well, you never know. Maybe I am in the minority here, but I personally think that if Athiests have to say 'probably' then the believers damn well should to.
ASA complaints site is here.
Following the (awesome) Athiest Bus campaign, where there was 'probably' no god, there are reports that the Christian party plan to run adverts that state 'there definitely is a god'.
I very much enjoyed the Atheist Bus campaign, which stated 'There's probably no god, now stop worrying and enjoy your life' and was pleased that the ASA ruled there was no breach of advertising codes, and allowed the campaign to go ahead. However, I read today (article linked above) that The Christian Party plan to run adverts which state 'There definitely is a God.'
As the existence of God is a matter of faith, not fact, I find it offensive as well as misleading that the Christian Party are apparently allowed to use the definitive, where as the Atheist bus campaign had to make do with 'probably'. Where opinion/faith is concerned, I think is inappropriate to allow any advertiser to explicitly state that there is or is not a God, when there is no proof either way, and so the statement is unverifiable.
I would appreciate it if this matter could be looked into, and whether The Christian Party's adverts should be, if not withdrawn, re-worded in the name of accuracy and fairness.
It may go no further, but if enough people complain, well, you never know. Maybe I am in the minority here, but I personally think that if Athiests have to say 'probably' then the believers damn well should to.
ASA complaints site is here.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-05 01:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-05 01:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-05 02:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-05 01:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-05 02:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-05 02:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-05 02:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-05 04:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-05 05:30 pm (UTC)Don't think it's quite got to the stage where we have taste audits ...
... now where did I put my thought police uniform.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-05 03:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-05 04:09 pm (UTC)Generally the ASA responds to comlaints about adverts which have been seen and might therefore have offended the public.
Early complaints may be discarded as 'solicited'
Strongly advise therefore sending another letter after Monday when its actually released which may be given more creedence.
because thats a press report you responded to and if their poster actually says 'probably' too....
no subject
Date: 2009-02-05 04:11 pm (UTC)From any reasonably logical view point it would be fair to say that if one group of people believe that their god exists therefore none other can and a separate group of people believe that their god exists, refuting anybody else's, then how can any of them exist? It's like people have played my god is better than your god and inventing story upon story to make it all up.
Does not make sense to me.
High Five!
Date: 2009-02-05 04:21 pm (UTC)Personally I find any attempt to convert people in a public forum distatefull but if we must submit to adverts attempting to alter our faith then can we at least ensure that they are held to the same standard.
Thank you.
JmC
Cheers to Kieran for the address
no subject
Date: 2009-02-05 04:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-05 04:56 pm (UTC)http://www.humanism.org.uk/bus-campaign
is what they were attempting to do.
JmC
I don't agree, mind
no subject
Date: 2009-02-05 07:41 pm (UTC)