Tortured artist or Tortured by fame?
Sep. 5th, 2007 10:23 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Last week I mentioned my pondering on the paths of destruction so many artists seem to go down, and wondered whether they were damaged because they were famous and, or famous because they were damaged.
Synchronicity calling. Why rock and roll stars die young.
It's been proved by SCIENCE, people. And Science is neva rong. Rite?
Synchronicity calling. Why rock and roll stars die young.
It's been proved by SCIENCE, people. And Science is neva rong. Rite?
no subject
Date: 2007-09-05 09:50 am (UTC)There are hundreds of examples - Geri Halliwell (and all of the spice girls, really) are interesting examples. Perhaps not talented, but fame hungry, for sure. Why? What makes someone *crave* fame? I asked that question in my last entry.
Maybe people who are more likely to walk that path seek out fame, as a way to fill whatever is lacking inside.
Maybe when they achive fame, and it doesn't make them happy, maybe that's when they fall apart.
Robbie Williams - drug problems. Liam Gallagher, drug and alcohol problems.
Pete and Amy are not isolated incidents by any means, just better publicised, as they don't hide it.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-05 10:02 am (UTC)I think that's a valid point actually. Many people who have a self-destructive bent crave love and approval, because they don't love themselves, and fame/fortune would seem to be the answer to it.
However their issues are entirely internal so fame/fortune will only serve to amplify those problems, rather than fixing them. The individual often can't/won't address their inner demons so ends up back on the road to self-destruction, only this time with a fortune to help them achieve it and fame enough that the media will be all too happy to push them along.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-05 10:13 am (UTC)As i got better, i managed to pull myself off that path of destruction, and funnily enough, the desire to be 'famous' was replaced with a desire to be 'happy'.
I hated being recognised by people i didn't know, I hated my name being mis-spelt in magazines. I hated people thinking they knew me because they'd read an interview, seen me on stage. I *hated* it. One someone i didn't know came up to me in a club, and they gave me a drink, and it was my 'drink of chouce' at the time. I had a panic attack over that. Odd, isn't it?
I has a similar thing when I lost a lot of weight. I'd always believed 'when I'm thin, I'll be happy'. I got thin. I wasn't happy. My whole world view crumbles, and the world falls over. That was the time i can pinpoint as when my depressive tendencies spiralled down into full on depression.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-05 01:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-05 01:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-05 01:57 pm (UTC)Industrial music?
no subject
Date: 2007-09-05 02:05 pm (UTC)I changed a lot as a person, and musically, and I had a lot of problems with my throat, and in the end I wasn't able to commit to them, personally or musically, as much as I should have, or as they needed.
Good old musical differences :)
no subject
Date: 2007-09-05 10:03 am (UTC)There are people who are actually driven by their art who become famous almost incidentally, as a side effect of many people liking their work and wanting to know who they are so they can find more of it. The media leaves these people alone to get on with it. It's generally only the ones who want to take a shortcut to fame who get in trouble, and then it becomes a vicious circle, the more attention they get...
no subject
Date: 2007-09-05 10:07 am (UTC)They were talented. They worked hard. They achieved fame through their art. THEN they fell apart.
Just because YOU didn't know who Amy Winehouse or The Libertines were before you heard about drug problems, doesn't mean they weren't famous.